WEDNESDAY MUSINGS - #23

RULES OF WASHINGTON D.C.:

- If it’s worth fighting for, it’s worth fighting dirty for.

- Don’t lie, cheat or steal . . . unnecessarily.

-There is always one more son of a bitch than you counted on.

- An honest answer can get you into a lot of trouble.

- The facts, although interesting, are irrelevant.

- Chicken Little only has to be right once.

- “NO” is only and interim response.

- You can’t kill a bad idea.

- If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence that you ever tried.

- The truth is variable.

- A porcupine with his quills down is just another fat rodent.

- You can agree with any concept or notional future option, in principle, but fight implementation every step of the way.

- A promise is not a guarantee.

- If you can’t counter the argument, leave the meeting.

Have you ever wondered why our government is so screwed up and acts in devious ways? Just about every single one of our elected officials either is or has been a LAWYER!!! This alone should tell you something.

NOW THIS:

Last Week the House of Representatives Held a Trans gender Discrimination Hearing:

TO OFFSET THE OVER WHELMING OPPOSITION THAT CAME UP LAST YEAR WHEN FELLOW DEMOCRATS FORCED THE REMOVAL OF LANGUAGE THAT WOULD GRANT SPECIAL RIGHTS TO “SHE-MALES”, “DRAG QUEENS”, CROSS DRESSERS, AND THOSE UNDER-GOING OR WHO HAVE HAD SEX-CHANGE OPERATIONS BY SURGERY OR HORMONE TREATMENTS, FROM THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA), THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HELD A FIRST EVER COMMITTEE HEARING ON ALLEGED “TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION” IN THE WORK PLACE. THIS HEARING, WHICH WENT UNREPORTED IN THE MEDIA, WAS A DISGUSTING CHARADE THAT ATTEMPTED TO SHOW HOW NORMAL THESE LIFE-STYLES ARE.

IF THE ENDA BILL HAD PASSED WITH THE ADDED GENDER IDENTITY LANGUAGE, IT WOULD GIVE MAJORITY STATUS TO THIS BEHAVIORAL GROUP THAT HAS NO BONA FIDE CLAIM TO THE REQUIREMENT OF BEING INSULAR AND DISCREET OR BEING “BORN” THAT WAY, SIMILAR TO RACE. ALSO, SUCH AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW WOULD CREATE VICTIMS OF THOSE OF US WHO BELIEVE IN THE NATURAL LAW OF THE CREATIVE ORDER OF MALE AND FEMALE, AND IT WOULD OPEN US UP TO BEING LABELED BIGOTS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF FACING LEGAL PUNISHMENTS.

REP. ROBERT ANDREWS (D-NJ), WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE EDUCATION AND LABOR SUBCOMMITTEE, WAS A STALWART DEFENDER OF TRANSGENDERS, AS THEIR “CREAM OF THE CROP” GAVE THEIR TESTIMONY TO THEIR CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION AFTER TELLING THEIR EMPLOYERS OF THEIR DECISION TO CHANGE THEIR SEX. THE PANEL FEATURED TWO MEN DRESSED AS WOMEN AND TWO WOMEN DRESSED AS MEN.

ANDREWS INTRODUCED BARNEY FRANK (D-MA) AND TAMMY BALDWIN (D-WI), TWO OPENLY HOMOSEXUAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, WHO URGED CONGRESS TO PASS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PROTECT THE “GENDER IDENTITY” OF THOSE PEOPLE WHOSE BIRTH SEX DOESN’T MATCH HOW THEY “FEEL” ABOUT THEMSELVES. BALDWIN MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT; “WE SHOULD NOT LEAVE BEHIND THE SMALLEST AND MOST VULNERABLE AMONGST US.” WHAT A HYPOCRITICAL STATEMENT IF EVER I HEARD ONE, ESPECIALLY WHEN SHE VOTES AGAINST ANY AND ALL PROTECTIONS FOR THE UNBORN. REP. BARNEY FAG, OOPS, I MEAN FRANK, IMPLIED THAT THIS LEGISLATION “WON’T HURT ANYBODY ELSE.” APPARENTLY HE IS TOO STUPID TO REALIZE THE HORRENDOUS EFFECT IT WOULD HAVE ON OTHER “CONFUSED” YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE IN DESPERATE NEED OF PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING, NOT LEGAL AFFIRMATION OF THEIR MENTAL CONFUSION.

THROUGHOUT THE ALMOST THREE HOUR HEARING, THERE WAS AN AWFUL LOT OF TALK ABOUT “GENDER IDENTITY”, BUT NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM EVEN DARED TO MENTION “GENDER IDENTITY DISORDER”, WHICH IS HOW THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA) DESCRIBES THOSE WHO REJECT THEIR BIRTH SEX AND THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE SO-CALLED SEX CHANGE OPERATIONS. ALSO, THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO DISCUSSION ABOUT THE VAST IMPLICATIONS OF HIRING DRAG QUEENS, CROSS-DRESSERS AND SHE-MALES IN THE WORK PLACE.

THIS WAS A DISTURBING SCENE TO THOSE WHO WHOLE-HEARTEDLY BELIEVE THAT ANYONE WHO REJECTS HIS/HER BIRTH SEX HAS A VERY BIG PROBLEM AND IS NEED OF LONG-TERM PSYCHIATRIC AND/OR SPIRITUAL HELP.

I MEAN, HOW CAN ANYBODY THINK THAT A MAN WHO HAS HIS SCHLONG CUT OFF AND PUMPS HIMSELF FULL OF FEMALE HORMONES SO THAT HE GROWS BOOBS, OR A WOMAN WHO HAS HER BOOBS REMOVED AND A SURGICALLY MANUFACTURED SCHLONG INSTALLED, AND PUMPS HERSELF FULL OF TESTOSTERONE SO AS TO GROW FACIAL HAIR, IS SOMEHOW NORMAL AND SHOULD BE EMBRACED BY EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES?

ONE OF THE WOMEN WHO CAME TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE PANEL WAS A MAN WHO WAS A FORMER U.S. ARMY SPECIAL FORCES OFFICER. ANOTHER WOMAN WAS ALSO A FORMER MAN WHO HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN OUR SPACE PROGRAM.

THIS WAS A REALLY SICK AND SAD DISPLAY OF THOSE WHOM THE APA TERMS MENTALLY DISORDERED, BUT WHO CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE NORMAL AND EVERYBODY ELSE TO BE BIGOTS AND GUILTY OF DISCRIMINATORY BEHAVIOR AGAINST THEM.

THE ONLY WITNESS TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE INCLUSION OF GENDER IDENTITY WAS GLEN LAVY OF THE ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND. HE STATED THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS LAW WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF THE DEEPLY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF SOME EMPLOYERS. ALSO, THAT THE EMPLOYER MUST CONSIDER AND PROTECT THE OTHER EMPLOYEE’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN SUCH AREAS SUCH AS THE USE OF BATHROOMS, OR THEY WILL RISK FACING LAWSUITS.

IF AN INDIVIDUAL WAS BORN A MALE, NO AMOUNT OF TAKING FEMALE HORMONES WILL EVER MAKE THAT PERSON A FEMALE, NEITHER WILL REMOVING HIS SCHLONG OR HAVING A COURT DECLARE HIM A FEMALE. THE ONLY THING IT WILL MAKE HIM IS A FREAK. YOU CANNOT CHANGE YOUR DNA, YOU ARE WHAT GOD CREATED YOU. THE SAME GOES FOR YOU WOMEN. YOU CAN TAKE ALL OF THE MALE HORMONES YOU WANT AND HAVE THE SURGEONS MAKE YOU THE BIGGEST SCHLONG IN THE WORLD, IT WILL NOT MAKE YOU A MALE, EVEN IF THE LAW CLAIMS YOU ARE. GOD KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE CREATED YOU, GET USED TO IT.