SUNDAYS TWO-CENTS WORTH: #44

AND THE BEAT GOES ON:

Seeing how this is Sunday, I was hoping to have something pleasant to blog about, but I must apologize because it seems that deceit, betrayal and evil just don’t want to give it a rest. Here is an interesting tidbit I happened across today, and it will give you a pretty good idea where America is headed.

THE STATE DEPARTMENT PROMOTES ‘MOSQUES IN AMERICA’ BY PUBLISHING A 2009 CALENDAR FEATURING WORSHIP SITES FOR ONLY ONE RELIGION:

Now available from the U.S. State Department: “2009 Mosques in America Wall Calendar; Limited Edition for Ramadan.

Oh yeah, you read that correctly. It’s perfect for Muslim outreach efforts. Where in heaven name is the ACLU on this.

This piece of crap calendar was being advertised by “Global Publishing Solutions,” which is a division pf the U.S. State Department, until at least until bloggers started chatting about it.

This then lead officials to hide the page behind the security of a password-protected wall, but the page is still viewable in a Google cache of the website.

The wall calendar features a brilliantly colored photograph or photo montage for each month, showing the “beauty of mosques in America.

Even JihadWatch.org stated that the page was pulled after the weblog Snapped Shot posted an image of it yesterday. Apparently, the good people who work for us over at the State Department get a bit furklempt when WE the PEOPLE begin to notice what they are doing.

If this was all so innocent, then why did the State Department folks get so nervous and then hide what they were doing? How come they never made a calendar showing Christian churches in America? I for one would like to know what they are really up to, especially with tax payer money.

ARE YOU READY FOR THIS?

A FEDERAL APPEALS COURT CLAIMS GAY RIGHTS TRUMP CHRISTIAN RIGHTS!!!

Believe it or not, a Federal Appeals Court dismissed a civil rights complaint brought by eleven Philadelphia Christians, ruling that their First Amendment rights were trumped by the First Amendment rights of homosexuals at the city’s tax-payer funded “OUTFEST” celebration that was held back in 2004. Now see if you can figure this one out for me. The court said:

“The city has an interest in ensuring that a permit-holder can use the permit for the purpose for which it was obtained,” Ok, I got that so far. “This interest necessarily includes the right of police officers to prevent counter-protesters from disrupting or interfering with the message of the permit holder.” Now that makes sense to me, but the part of this whole thing is how come homosexuals and/or other groups are allowed to disrupt and interfere with Christians when they are having some sort of program?

It is clear to see that the judge’s decision has set a precedent to eliminate the First Amendment rights of others by citing that a “permitting scheme” can be used by police and event organizers to ‘exclude persons expressing contrary messages’ in public areas and at public events, but only if it is Christians expressing contrary messages.