Thursday, March 13, 2008

FREAKY DEAKY FRIDAY - #F5












The Government’s Iron Fisted Control Over Our Children in the Public School System is Getting Out of Hand!


Two four year-olds in the Bronx were tossed out of class and HANDCUFFED by a school-safety officer. Their ‘CRIME’, refusing to take a nap! The parents of the two preschoolers are up in arms and are filing a lawsuit against the city.


According to one of their Lawyers, the incident took place on November 17, 2006. The lawyer stated that Jaden Diaz and Christopher Brito – who were both four-years old at the time and students at CS 211, a Bilingual School – told their parents that a substitute teacher took them and another boy to an empty classroom and left them there alone.


The lawyer states that after awhile, the school-safety officer entered the room and placed the boys in handcuffs, then further terrorized them by telling them they would never see their parents again. Ms. Vasso Brito, Christopher’s mother, is trying to transfer her son to another public school. She said that she is “shocked” to learn of what she considers to be an absolute abuse of authority.


Jaden Diaz, who is now six-years old, said that he remembers a man who was dressed like a cop walked in, sat at a big desk – “like the one the judge is on” – and threatened them.


“He was a police,” Jaden went on to say. “He said, ‘You know what happens when you don’t go to sleep in there?. . . When you go to jail, your not going to have no fun, no TV, no toys.’”


According to the lawyer, the families are seeking unspecified damages, and he added: “Failure to comply with nap time is hardly an offense that warrants being handcuffed, or threatened for that matter. Nothing would have warranted that.”


The New York City Department of Education and the NYPD, which oversees school-safety officers, refused to make any comments.


The case of Jaden and Christopher recalls two other recent cases in the New York City School district. One involved a mentally challenged 10-year-old Brooklyn girl who accused a school-safety officer of handcuffing her outside her school. The other case involved a five-year-old Queens boy handcuffed by a school-safety officer inside his school.


Enough is enough! LEAVE OUR KIDS ALONE, STOP HANDCUFFING THEM, STOP MOLESTING THEM AND STOP CORRUPTING THEIR MORALS! THEY ARE OUR CHILDREN, NOT YOURS. YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO EDUCATE THEM, NOT SCARE THE HELL OUT OF THEM, NOT ENGAGE IN SEX WITH THEM AND NOT TO INDOCTRINATE THEM WITH YOUR LIBERAL FILTH!



PAGE 2:


Will There Be An Uprising On The Horizon In California?


When you screw with people’s children you had better be prepared for all hell to break loose. People may stand silent when you pass laws to make them wear seatbelts when driving and helmets when they are on a motorcycle. They may remain mute when you enact laws that they cannot smoke in their own homes. They may also remain silent as you enact even more gun control laws in violation of the US Constitution and infringe on their right to eat what and how much they please, but mess with their children and their parental rights and you are asking for more trouble then you can handle.


If it is permitted to stand, the recent decision by the 2nd District Court of Appeals in the case of Rachel L., a home-schooling parent, could very well be the “straw that breaks the camel’s back”, and sets off an uprising of mighty proportions in California.


In this case, Justice H. Walter Croskey overruled a lower court’s decision as an “error of law” and he argued flat out that “parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children.”


The lower court had simply addressed the individual case of Rachel L., describing her education as being “lousy,” “meager” and “bad.” If Justice Croskey had acknowledged these to be disqualifying criteria in general, he would have had to shut down half or more of the public schools in California.


Instead, Croskey has ruled that a parent educating their child at home, “whatever the quality of that education,” does not exempt the child from “compulsory education in a public full-time day school.” The only exemption that Justice Croskey allows is if the parents hold a valid state teaching license.


But, the teaching license “MUST BE FOR THE GRADE LEVEL BEING TAUGHT”, which makes it even more impossible for parents with more than one child being home schooled.


Parents are prepared to take their case all the way to the Supreme Court and if they fail there, you just might see the proverbial poop hit the fan.


Now, I may be wrong, but it is my belief that the reason more and more states are trying to outlaw home schooling, is because of two reasons:


One; more and more parents are opting to home school their children for a number of different reasons (not all of them being religious) which is costing the States to lose federal funds, since the amount of money they receive is based on the number of children enrolled in the public school system.


Two; if parents are home schooling their children, the State cannot control the minds of those children, which means that they are not able to brainwash them with their One World liberal ideology, which could be a threat to their One World Government plans.


An interesting note: Germany has outlawed home schooling. Why are our judges following foreign law, are we no-longer a Sovereign Nation with our own Constitution?