Why are Bill and Hillary Clinton so popular and well liked around the world?
WARNING: This blog posting contains some things that are NOT politically correct and may offend some people. If there are some who are offended by anything written here, I do not apologize and I will not bury the truth for the sake of political correctness. My hope is to smack people right across the face with the truth in the hopes that they will wake up, pull their heads out of their collective butts, and begin to look at the world as it really is.
We are constantly told that the Clintons, especially Bill are held in high esteem all around the world, and that Bill is such a great public speaker and motivator. We have been told that under Clinton the economy was stable and of course, the Stock Market was sky-rocketing, Hillary, along with her husband are lauded as being so brilliant and the greatest politicians that have ever lived, and what a great senator Hillary has been for New York. Boy have you all been sold the biggest snow job to come down the pike in recent history.
The truth is the Clintons are legends in their own minds, and everything that we are told about their greatness and brilliance has been spoon fed to us by the MSM. First of all, Bill Clinton can’t even hold a candle to Ronald Reagan (the “Great Communicator”) or John F. Kennedy when it came to motivating people when thy spoke. I still remember how moved I was when President Kennedy gave his inaugural address with the line; “The torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans…” and “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” And who can forget Reagan’s: “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” Every speech I heard Bill Clinton give, bored me to tears and I certainly didn’t trust anything he had to say because every time he spoke he always had a stupid smirk on his face that gave me the feeling that he was gloating over having pulled a fast one on us, and if you notice, G.W. Bush has that same smirk. Very disconcerting if you ask me.
As to the economy under Clinton, sure the economy was growing by leaps and bounds with the stock market going through the roof, but what happened right after Clinton’s second term ended and George W. Bush took office? Just in case you may have forgotten, that is when all of the corporate scandals started to emerge, remember Enron? Enron was just the tip of the iceberg. We began to learn how the CEO’s of several large corporations had been fudging and inflating their corporate books for many years (all during the Clinton administration).
Considering that those who elected Clinton as president were from the drug crazed hippie generation, is it any wonder that they elected a pot smoking, draft-dodging, womanizer to be our president and “Commander-in-Chief” of our armed forces? Even Clinton’s brother, Roger Clinton, said: “My brother has a nose like a vacuum cleaner”, a reference to Bill snorting cocaine. Not only was Bill Clinton a draft dodger during the Vietnam War, but he even had the audacity to go to Moscow, Russia to join in a protest against the United States.
Like it or not, the truth must be faced that Bill Clinton not only did more to single-handedly destroy the morals of this country during his eight years in office, but he also did more to place this nation in danger from our enemies in China and the Middle East. He allowed all types of military technology to be sold to Communist China or to fall into their hands, in exchange for bags full of cash delivered to him in the White House to help finance his re-election campaign. This action has allowed the Chinese to perfect their missal guidance systems. Then when Islamic terrorists blew up the U.S.S. Cole and bombed two U.S. Embassies in Africa, there was absolutely no response from Clinton, making the U.S. look weak and impotent. And don’t forget the fact that two or three times Bill Clinton blew his chances to have Osama Bin Laden arrested.
While all of this was going on, Clinton was turning the Oval Office into his own private bordello and he and Hillary were treating the Lincoln Bedroom like a “Bed-and-Breakfast”, renting it out to the highest bidders. Neither Bill nor Hillary had even a modicum of respect for the Office of the President or for the White House. There were so many in the African/American community who considered Bill Clinton to be the “first Black” president. Why? Because he did drugs and was a womanizer who seemed to disrespect women. Another reason the Black community is so enthralled with the Clinton's in particular and the Democrats in general, is because they have maintained the sense of victim hood and entitlement, which is the same reason that so many in the Hispanic community are so pro Democrat. Today, this same sense of entitlement and victim hood has managed to infect a large portion of the American population. All the Democrats have to do is promise all sorts of cradle-to-grave handouts and people start flocking to them with out-stretched hands, giving no thought as to how it is all to be paid for.
By all rational thought, when Clinton was impeached, he should have been immediately removed from Office. Why wasn’t he? Well lately, some of you may have read in some of my posts that the Republican and Democrat parties are morphing into one (more about this later). The Senate was controlled by the Republicans during the impeachment proceedings, so why didn’t they vote to have Clinton removed from office? Because they were covering their own butts, and of course, the MSM kept telling us that Clinton should never have been impeached because it was only about sex and nothing Clinton did rose to being an impeachable offense. Well, I’m sorry, but it was about more than sex. It was about Bill Clinton lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury, it was about Bill Clinton violating several federal laws and it was about Bill Clinton lying to us, the American people. When he was found guilty of lying under oath, the only punishment he received was to lose his law license temporarily and he was given a huge fine, which neither he nor his wife paid out of their own pockets. Instead, they shamelessly held fundraisers to have their friends and the public pay for not only the fine, but also to pay for their legal bills.
Now let’s take a look at Hillary. Hillary Clinton is even more of a leftist then her Husband. There was a period during their college days that both Bill and Hillary spent a good deal of time living at a communist commune in Italy and Hillary was a disciple of Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky, who was a radical leftist, found the Industrial Areas Foundation while organizing the Woodlawn neighborhood, which trained leftist organizers and assisted in the founding of community organizations around the country. In Rules for Radicals (his final work, published one year before his death), he addressed the 1960s generation of leftist radicals, outlining his views on organizing for mass power.
Saul Alinsky taught his eager disciples that the establishment despised conflict. He blamed this perverse malady upon the dual forces of organized religion (those turn-the-other-cheek folks) and the Madison Avenue advertising culture, which he said "emphasizes getting along with people and avoiding friction." Alinsky deemed avoidance of conflict as not only disgusting, but contrary to the betterment of a "free and open society." His 13th rule for radicals is: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” The polarization of American politics and American Society that has taken place since the Clintons first appeared on the national scene has been notable. Stirring the pot of constant agitation has been the Clintons' signature political accomplishment, a very socialistic/communistic action of continued revolution. Socialism and Communism cannot last long without a constant class struggle.
Alinsky taught that to force a transfer of power through the use of constantly agitated serial conflicts, there had to be a personal enemy around which to rally the troops. The reason why Hillary’s “vast right wing conspiracy” significantly failed to keep America on the Clintons' side was because it wasn’t personal enough.
To have a successful socialist revolution, one needs to identify their target for polarization and that may involve singling out the CEO of a multi-layered corporation or finding out which person in government holds the seat where the buck truly does stop, or in the impeachment of Bill Clinton, finding out just who was out to get our imperfect but lovable president.
The Clintons employed their now infamous brand of tag-team Alinsky polarization in Bill's 1990 bid for re-election as Arkansas' governor. The race was pivotal to the Clintons' presidential aspirations. Without a sufficient state-government launching pad, his campaign for the 1992 nomination would not succeed, and neither Bill nor Hillary cared who they had to hurt and stomp on to make it to the top.
To show you how low Hillary will sink to gain the White House and complete the destruction of America as we know it, which was started under her husband’s administration, Hillary sent out her lackeys to begin thinly veiled personal attacks against Obama, while Bill defended the ridicule angle from his lofty position as a former president. This pattern was set in the Muslim accusation and the drug use reminder. Hillary would have a campaign professional or volunteer make a charge against Obama, either before television cameras or in emails, then she would make a big show of “firing” that person. Both of these attacks against Obama were personal, aimed not at Obama’s stand on any issue, but on his character. A prime example of the Alinsky “personalize-your-target” tactics.
It should be very obvious by now that Hillary has seized upon race to create a white backlash of electoral victories. Hillary knows that by attacking Obama's authenticity as a new icon for African-Americans, the black community will rally to Obama, thereby demonstrating to the broader electorate that it's been about race all along.
Hillary is not brilliant, she is devious, and even more so then her husband. In many ways, Hillary has been a creation of the Rockefellers. There has even been some talk that Bill Clinton may well be an illegitimate offspring of one of the Rockefellers, as a result of a liaison between the member of the Rockefeller family and Clinton’s mother when his mother was a “good-time” call girl who would attend parties of the “elite”. I can’t prove this, but it is a story that was circulating when Bill Clinton was president. It was said that Clinton’s mother was receiving money for Bill’s support from an unknown source, but that source was suspected to be a member of the Rockefeller family. It would explain how Bill was able to have the money to attend the best colleges and universities, seeing how his mother worked as a nurse and was raising two boys alone. Roger Clinton is Bill’s half brother.
But I digress. There is a memorandum which the Clinton Library was forced to release under the Freedom of Information Act. The 24 page memorandum sheds some light on Hillary’s little-known relationship with America’s mightiest oil and banking dynasty. Dated May 26, 1993 and addressed to “Hillary Rodham Clinton”, the memo came from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia – whose great-grandfather founded the Standard Oil Company.
The memo laid out a detailed strategy for pushing ahead the “Clinton reform plan” for universal health coverage (socialized medicine). In the memo, Sen. Rockefeller issued orders at Hillary, using the imperious tones of a man accustomed to blind obedience.
He ordered Hillary to get tough on critics of the health plan and to “impeach the credibility of opponents”. He ordered her to “Portray them as “perpetrators”, “paid lobbyists” and purveyors of “ideological extremism”. Assign investigators to conduct “opposition research” on them and expose their “lifestyles”. Do not allow them “even one day without scrutiny”.
Only five days after his inauguration, Bill appointed Hillary to be chairman of his National Task Force on Health Care Reform. Prior to that, she had absolutely no experience as a health care reformer. In order to carry out the assignment, she had to rely heavily on the guiding hand of Jay Rockefeller, who watched closely over the Task Force.
As late as 1989, Hillary was not yet known as a national policymaker. She worked for a crooked Arkansas law firm. Radical education reformer Marc Tucker hired Hillary that year as a lobbyist for his National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE). Tucker had a dream of imposing a Soviet-style school-to-work system on Americans, whereby the government would manage every citizen’s life, steering young children into career tracks, and then placing them in jobs after graduation, in corporations vetted by government overseers. It is Rockefeller money that has funded Tucker’s think tank, and David Rockefeller, Jr., son of the family patriarch David Rockefeller, who led Chase Manhattan Bank for twenty-one years as president, then chairman and CEO, sat on Tucker’s board.
The Rockefeller’s are well known for their support of a One World Government, and it was the Rockefellers who helped plan and put into effect the illegal and unconstitutional Federal Reserve Banking System. It was also the Rockefeller family who donated the land upon which sits the United Nations Building complex.
Eight days after Bill Clinton was elected, Marc Tucker wrote a letter to Hillary in which he said: “I still cannot believe you won. But utter delight that you did pervades all the circles in which I move. I met last Wednesday in David Rockefeller’s office with him, along with Apple Computer CEO, John Sculley, Dave Barram and David Haselkorn. It was a great celebration. Both John and David R. were more expansive than I have ever seen them — literally radiating happiness. My own view and theirs is that this country has seized its last chance.”
Why David Rockefeller would be “radiating happiness” at the Clintons’ ascension to the White House is not clear. But it is cause for worry. Something fishy is going on with the Clintons and Rockefellers. This election season, Americans need to look deep to discover their hidden agendas. Are you worried yet? If not you should be.
Earlier, I stated that both the Republican and Democrat parties are morphing into one. I don’t know how many of you realize it yet or not, but it is getting harder and harder to tell them apart. But the truth in what I am saying is very evident when you stop to realize that all of the Homeland Security mandates that have recently been put into place under the G.W. Bush administration, and more soon to be enacted, were all planed and perfected during the Clinton administration through Executive Orders, and most of them were enacted right after 9/11. When one stops to really analyze the Homeland Security programs, it becomes very clear that none of them are geared to keep our homeland secure but they are geared toward gaining evermore control over the citizens of this country, to control and keep tabs on our movements and our banking and spending habits, to monitor all of our phone conversations and what we do and say on the internet.
Those of you who bothered to read the “AWAKE YOU WHO SLEEP” articles I wrote and posted to this blog site, may remember my mentioning the Hegelian Dialectic which is a step-by-step instruction for how to take total control over a person, a group, or over entire nations. According to the Hegelian Dialectic, first you create and develop a solution to a problem that does not exist. Once you have the solution set and ready to go, you then either create or cause the problem or you allow the problem to take place so that you can then enact your solution. Now, think about this in light of all the Homeland Security programs that were created by Clinton. They just needed something big to take place so that they could be enacted. Voila, 9/11. It may be a stretch, but could this be the reason why Bill Clinton refused to arrest Osama Bin Laden when he had the chance? Is it possible that both parties are working in tandem to bring about the demise of American sovereignty and set up a One World Government? Is this why neither party really wants to secure our borders, because they plan to enact the North American Union which was planned in secret starting under the Clinton administration, behind the backs of congress and the American people? This is a plan to unite Mexico, the U.S. and Canada into one with a single currency. G.W. Bush kept denying that such plans had been made, calling it a conspiracy theory, but the former president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, admitted that it was true, while a guest on the Larry King Live show back in October. Fox said it was planned back under the Clinton administration and that it has moved forward under G.W. Bush’s administration.
Fox also stated that this union will eventually include all of Central and South America. Could this be why the American economy seems to be in a nosedive and the U.S. dollar devalued? Destroy our economy and that will make it easier to replace the dollar with the Amero, similar to the Euro. And, I recently heard talk that the new federally mandated State drivers ID licenses will bear, on the backside, the proposed logo for the North American Union. Do you realize that if and when this Union takes place, it will put an end to our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. It will bring to an end all of the rights and freedoms we have grown up with. The United States as we know it will be gone forever.
Where do you think Hillary Clinton stands in all this? Are you worried or afraid yet? If not, you should be.
Now, this brings me back to my original question: Why are Bill and Hillary Clinton so popular and well liked around the world? Could it be that the whole world has been bamboozled by these two, or could it be that the whole world has become just as sleazy, devious and morally bankrupt as these two? Either answer is extremely troubling, don’t you think?
|