Tuesday, July 31, 2007

WEDNESDAY: GOLDEN PIG AWARD - #7





“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”


More Attacks on Christianity.

‘Jesus’ deflowers virgin sexpot, and a whole lot more in a new “COMEDY

Click on the picture to read the article:


Where are the “Hate Crimes” advocates when this kind of crap is put out? Let a college student put the Koran in the toilet and he is charged with a hate crime, but this kind of sacrilegious bull s&%t is looked upon as art and freedom of speech. Go figure.

Country after country in Europe, and many places here in the U.S., are giving concessions to Muslims, such as the public school systems separating boys and girls into separate classrooms to placate Muslim “sensibilities”, they are allowing Muslim girls to wear their head scarves in school, yet they forbid Christian and Jewish students from wearing and kind of religious symbols. Jews and Christians are not allowed to pray in school, but Muslim students can not only pray in school and other public areas, but now many schools, colleges, universities, and even airports are installing, at taxpayer expense, special foot-washing sinks to accommodate the Muslims. Now, as in a European case, you have Muslim women on planes refusing to take their assigned seats if the have to sit next to a male passenger they do not know, demanding that the non-Muslim passengers change seats to accommodate them.

We are supposed to show all kinds of respect to Muslims. We are supposed to treat homosexuals and lesbians with the utmost respect and toleration, and on and on it goes, but Christians are supposed to keep their mouths shut while crosses and crucifixes are submerged in jars of piss. We are supposed to shut our pie holes when elephant crap is used to “paint” a picture of the Virgin Mary. We dare not speak out when a play portrays the Apostles and Jesus as a bunch of flaming fags, because all of this “ART”.

I say enough is enough! And to all those who won’t rise up to put a stop to this, and to all those who will bow to Muslim demands, while allowing their own religion and culture to be trashed, here in a nation that was founded upon Judeo/Christian Law, I proudly award the Golden Pig Award.






“Abouna” Gregori

Monday, July 30, 2007

TUESDAY LESSONS IN CIVICS-#11






LESSONS IN CIVICS & THE CONSTITUTION – J (Part A)

DeLovio vs. Boit (1815)



In the DeLovio vs. Boit case, in 1815, the Supreme Court ruled as follows, {the opinion was written by Justice Story}:

“The Admiralty, from the highest antiquity, has exercised a very extensive criminal jurisdiction, and punished offenses by fine and imprisonment. The celebrated inquisition at Queensborough, in the reign of Edward III, would alone be decisive. And, even at Common Law it had been adjudged, that the Admiralty might fine for contempt. . . Appeal and not a Writ of Error, lies for its decrees. . Yet, it is conceded on all sides that of maritime hypothecations of the Admiralty depends, or ought to depend, as to contracts upon the subject matter, i.e. whether maritime or not; and as to torts, upon locality. . .

Neither the Judicial Act nor the Constitution, which it follows, limits the Admiralty Jurisdiction of the District Court in any respect to place. It is bounded only by the nature of the cause over which it is to decide. On the whole, I am, without the slightest hesitation, ready to pronounce, that the delegation of cognizance of ‘all civil cases of Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction’ to the Courts of the United States comprehends all maritime contracts, torts, and injuries. The latter branch is necessarily bounded by locality; the former extends over all contracts, (whatsoever they may be made or executed, or whatsoever may be the form of the stipulation) which may relate to the navigation, business or commerce of the sea.

The next inquiry is what is properly to be deemed ‘maritime contracts.’ Happily, in this particular there is little room for controversy. All civilians and jurists agree that in this appellation are included, among other things, marine hypothecations . . . My judgment accordingly is, that policies of insurance are within (though not exclusively within) the Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction of the United States.”

Now Meet Professor Frederich List

The letters of Dr. List, along with the theories of economics which he espoused in those letters, will become extremely important to you when you realize that his theories are being applied against you today by the Federal Reserve – and are, thereby controlling every aspect of your life.

List was a representative of the society of German merchants and manufacturers for the express purpose of obtaining a German system of national economy. His plans proved obnoxious to the government, which charged him with high treason and threw him in prison. He was subsequently exiled from Germany. He soon after settled in Pennsylvania where he studied and lectured on the doctrines of political economy, and he voluntarily addressed a series of letters which were published in the National Gazette. List was also a member of the George Rapp Harmony Society. In his first letter, List explains what he means by the term “National Economy.

National Economy” teaches by what means a nation, in their particular situation, may direct and regulate the economy of individuals, and restrict the economy of mankind, either to prevent foreign restrictions and foreign powers within itself . . . without restricting the economy of individuals and the economy of mankind more than the welfare of the people permits.”

It is well known that we have a “National Economy” in America today that directs and regulates the economy of individuals, and that of mankind – and that this economy is being controlled and regulated by the Federal Reserve System.

Swift v. Tyson, 16 Peters 1 (1842)

The Supreme Court held, in the case of Swift V. Tyson in 1842, that there was a Federal common law (i.e., at that time, access to substantive common law existed at the federal level).

Limited Liability Act – 1851

The Congress of the United States enacted the Limited Liability Act on March 3rd 1851, (codified at 46 USC 181- 189), as amended in 1875, 1877, 1935, 1936, and the Act of 1884 covers the entire subject of limitations. The purpose of this act was to limit the liability for the payment of debts of persons who were ship owners involved in maritime commerce. The act was the result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision titled, “The New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. vs. the Merchants Bank, 6 Howard 42, (1848).” In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Common Law, ship owners were liable for the acts of their ship masters. In other words, if a party was to ship goods on board a ship and something happened to the goods such as being destroyed or damaged by the perils of sea, the ship owner was responsible to the owner of the goods.

Therefore, the ship owner must pay what the amount of the goods was worth, to the owner of the goods. If the ship owner failed to pay the debt, the owner of the goods could sue the ship owner and collect. If the ship owner failed to pay, the creditor could then file a lien on the ship which was called a maritime lien which does not require possession of the object. This Act specifically gives limited liability on shipments of “bills of any bank or public body.” America was founded upon Maritime or Admiralty Law because shipping was the only means of commerce at the time of our founding.

In 1851, Congress decided that as a result of the New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. case, persons would no longer be drawn into ownership of ships because of the liability involved. Shipping on the high seas is extremely risky, especially at that period of time.

The U.S. Supreme Court, after the Limited Liability Act was enacted (1889), ruled in the Butler vs. Boston & Savannah Steamship Co., 130 U.S. 527, that:

But it is enough to say that the rule of limited responsibility is now our maritime rule. It is the rule by which through the Act of Congress we announced that we propose to administer justice in maritime cases.

The rule of limited liability prescribed by the Act of 1851 is nothing more than the old maritime rule administered in courts of admiralty in all countries except England from immemorial and if this were not so, the subject matter itself is one that belongs to the department of Maritime Law.”

Next week, August 7th, I will cover:

Tontine Insurance - 1868


I wish to ask each of you who view this blog to please click on the Illuminati symbol below. It will take you to a Google video that will explain much of what I have been trying to teach you through my weekly Lessons in Civics and Awake You who Sleep articles.

This video is rather long (47 min. 05 sec.), but it is truly important. Once you have viewed and listened to the entire video, you WILL have a deeper knowledge of what is happening and is about to happen to the United States. Please view this video with an open mind.

I wish to thank my friend Karen over at Light and Life, for sending me this link.




“Abouna” Gregori

Sunday, July 29, 2007

MONDAY MADNESS #6










“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”


















Osama or Obama? Click on the picture to read the full story.

Just whose side is Obama on? Who does he think he represents in Congress?

While addressing the National Council of La Raza's annual convention

in Miami Beach last week, he called the defeat, in the Senate, of Bush’s “shamnesty” immigration bill “Both ugly and racist in a way we haven’t seen since the struggle for civil rights.”

Now, he claims that the federal courts decision to rule against the town of Hazelton in Pennsylvania, to prevent them from enacting a law that would have protected the citizens against hostile foreigners filling their town with drugs, crime and gangs, is a Victory for all Americans

All of this coming from the man who wants to be President of the United States. The man who says that if he wins, he will, in his first year as president, sit down and meet with the leaders of countries who are hostile to the U.S., and he is pushing for the U.S. military to withdraw from Iraq.

This man is a danger to the to the freedom and future of the United States, and even if he don’t win the Democratic primary, there is a good chance that if Hillary wins, she may choose him to be her vice-presidential running mate. I think that we must prevent this at all cost.


Now for the Conclusion of Last Monday’s Posting of:


There are many scoffers here in America who will say that those who believe that the Constitution could possibly be overthrown or that there are those who may actually be involved in the process to over throw it, are nothing more than a bunch of conspiracy nut jobs.

I think that those who refuse to question certain evidences, those who would blindly swallow, hook line and sinker, everything that they are spoon fed by the MSN media and those in congress, are just burying their heads in the sand. When people refuse to question and just accept, that puts society in grave danger.

There is plenty of evidence that much of the legislation that has been past for more than 60 years, and much of what our elected officials have done, has been, and is, in substantial violation of the Constitution. Our Federal and State governments have usurped powers that have no foundation whatsoever in any of the provisions of the Constitution. They try to justify these assumed powers by claiming they are needed to protect us against “bad people” or that the State or Federal government has a “vested interest” in what ever area they are assuming the power. In that case, then the government could claim to have a vested interest in every area of our lives, which is slowly what they doing, as these usurpations are increasingly being used to deprive us of our rights. Even the most beneficial programs are being turned into avenues of corruption and means of gaining more and more control over the citizens. Those whom we elect to represent us, once in office, continually push the envelope test the tolerance of the public, to see far they can go and how much they can get away with, and it is not just a few rogue governmental or corporate officials who have become corrupted with greed for wealth and power, who pose an occasional threat, the truth is the whole culture of entire institutions has become corrupt and criminal in both intent and execution.

Is it a conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution or just ‘emergent behavior’ that while it may pose a threat, is not deliberate or conscious? The tight coordination between the various governmental departments, offices and even private corporations and individuals involved, certainly deserves the name of CONSPIRACY, and we cannot deny that they have conscious knowledge of what they are doing.

What is truly sad is that WE THE PEOPLE continually allow them to get away with it. A member of congress was once asked why he didn’t argue against a piece of proposed legislation that would be a violation of the constitution, he answered: If I insisted on complying with the Constitution, I wouldn’t stay in congress very long.” So, to our elected officials, the Constitution becomes just another piece of paper to be ignored or discarded if We the People do not bring pressure to bear to uphold it.

It is high time that we start to hold our elected officials’ feet to the fire. It is time that we force them to obey their oath of office and uphold the Constitution of the United States. If we refuse to do so, then we can no longer claim to be a nation of laws. By allowing this TREASONOUS trend to continue, we are making a mockery of our legal system, and the day will come, sooner than we think, that we will find that we have lost our country and our God given freedoms. When that day arrives, we will only have ourselves to blame.

Thomas Jefferson once said that we ought to have a revolution every twenty years, and that the Tree of Liberty needed to be occasionally watered with the blood of patriots. I wonder, will it take the shedding of the blood patriots to get people to once again take the Constitution seriously?




“Abouna” Gregori

Saturday, July 28, 2007

SUNDAYS TWO-CENTS WORTH- #6






“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”







Is The Prosecution Over-reaching?





Two TV News helicopters collided while filming a high speed police chase on live TV, killing all four people on board.

Both of the helicopters went down in a grassy park in central Phoenix and burst into flames.

TV viewers did not witness the crash since the cameras aboard the aircraft were pointed at the ground, but they saw video from one of the helicopters breakup and begin to spin before the station suddenly switched to the studio.

The crews aboard the two helicopters were covering a police pursuit of a work truck. Moments before the helicopters collided, the driver had jumped out of the nearly disabled vehicle and carjacked another truck. The suspect was later taken into custody by a SWAT team, after barricading himself inside a house.

Police identified the suspect as Christopher J. Jones, 23. He was booked into jail late on Friday night on two counts of vehicle theft, four counts of aggravated assault on a police officer and one count of resisting arrest with other charges expected to be filed later.

One of these other charges being contemplated is charging Jones with the deaths of the four news men.

Now, I am very much a law and order type of person, and I believe that those who have committed crimes, if found guilty should be punished, but I DO NOT believe that Jones should be charged in the death of the newsmen. They were doing their job. Jones had no control over them, nor did he know that they would be up there filming him.

From what I have been hearing so far, is that the newsmen/pilots weren’t paying attention to what they were doing, as they were all focused on what was happening on the ground, failing to notice that they were getting way to close to each other. It would be a stretch to somehow charge Jones with their deaths and it would be a travesty of justice.

Jones may not be a very nice person, as he had a prior arrest record, but there is no way that he should be held responsible for the deaths of the four newsmen. Nobody forced them to take that job, and it was their responsibility to pay attention to what they were doing.

It is getting totally out of hand, the way the TV stations feel that they all have to hurry up and get choppers in the air whenever there is a police chase, just for ratings. Why does there have to be three, four, five or more helicopters all flying around in close proximity to each other, when one or two “pool helicopters” would do? If anyone is to blame for the deaths of the four news men, it is themselves and the TV stations that employed them, NOT JONES.

What say you?




“Abouna” Gregori


Friday, July 27, 2007

MUNCHKIN'S SATURDAY CORNER # 19









What a messed up world!

The majority of Americans have been demanding something be done about the illegal immigration problem. They have been writing letters, sending faxes and making phone calls demanding that the federal government enforce the immigration laws that have already been on the books for years, but those who have been elected to represent us have shown us that they do not wish to any thing. So, it should come as no surprise that many communities across the country have decided to take matters into their own hands through their local governments. Believe it or not, this is an entirely proper role for these local governments to take.

In 2006, the citizens of Hazleton, Pennsylvania noticed some rather troubling signs from an increase of illegal immigration in their community. There was an increase in murders, drug-related crimes and their school district bursting at the seams. The tax-payer-funded English as a Second Language program rose from a cost of $500 a year in 2001 to a whopping $1 million + a year today.

The citizens of Hazelton demanded that something be done, thus the Illegal Immigration Relief Act was introduced by the mayor and was supported by the city by a vote of 4 to 1.

The purpose of this Act was designed to reduce crime, reduce the numbers in the increasingly overcrowded schools, and reduce the rising hospital and medical costs, and the escalating demands for city services that were being placed upon the citizens of Hazelton due to the huge influx of illegal immigrants. Under this Act, the law would deny licenses to businesses that knowingly and continually hire illegal immigrants. It would fine landlords $1,000.00 for each illegal immigrant discovered renting their properties. And, it would require city documents to be in English only.

It is obvious that this Act is about dealing with the illegal immigration problem. The mayor and city officials of Hazelton made that perfectly clear right from the start. But the ACLU, as is their want, purposely decided to muddy the waters and portray Hazelton’s law as much uglier. They portrayed it as an Anti-Immigration bill. They filed a suit in the Federal Court to block the law.

The ACLU was successful. The court made two conclusions. It found that the Act violated the due process clause of the Constitution and they claim that city lacked the authority to enact the law because Congress had preempted the field. So what the court said was “Congress has passed laws that preempt the field of immigration. As a result, state and local governments cannot enact laws to control illegal immigration or even the effects of illegal immigration.”

Now think about this ruling and what it means. Congress has preempted the field, so state and local governments are powerless to act. Then, Congress and the federal authorities do nothing to prevent illegal immigration, in violation of the Constitution and their oath of office, placing an undue burden on the states and local communities, but those communities cannot act because Congress says they can’t. What kind of sense does that make? Gosh! I’m just a dog and I can see that this makes no sense at all.

Hazelton plans to appeal this ruling and well they should. Our Constitutional Republic system allows our citizens to take reasonable actions to protect their communities, and that is exactly what Hazelton is attempting to do. And, it is what many other communities around the nation are trying to do.

The ruling on the part of the federal court wasn’t the worst of it, even though it was bad enough. You see, the ACLU brought their case on behalf of the illegal immigrants in Hazelton, and what the court did was a total disgrace. The court gave rights to the illegal immigrants that citizens of this country don’t even get. They (the illegals) demanded that they not have to appear in court and that they do not have to even give their names, on the grounds that to do so might result in their being deported. The court granted both of these demands. Also they were granted the right to sue the city. No American citizen can bring a law suit against anyone; city or individual, and not have to give their name or even appear in court.

Don’t that Bite?

Get a load of this!

The following was on a segment of Hannity and Colmes this evening on the Fox News Channel:

Two 13 year old middle school boys in Oregon were arrested and charged with ten counts of felony sexual abuse and assault. This took place this past February.

What did they do? They were doing what most of the students in their school were doing, observing “Butt Swat Friday”, which means that they ran around swatting each other (male and female) on the butt. A substitute teacher happened to observe them and decided that what they were doing was politically incorrect so she reported them and insisted the police be called.

The two boys were held in juvenile detention for over a week. So far, the felony sexual assault charges have been dropped, but both boys are still facing five counts each of sexual abuse charges, which are considered misdemeanors. If found guilty of these, they could face up to five years on each count and be forced to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives. All for innocent harmless fun.

This is political correctness gone amok.




“Boy am I a sad puppy. Do you know why?”

“Because this is how liberals view the world!”



See ya all next week, Lord willing and

the creek don’t rise.


Thursday, July 26, 2007

FREAKY DEAKY FRIDAY: _ F





I now feel VINDICATED!!!
























After years of trying to inform people of the illegality of the Federal Income Tax, I finally read the following today:





The Internal Revenue Service was challenged by a lawyer to prove, in front of jury, the constitutional basis for the nation’s income tax, and they LOST.

I think now people are beginning to realize that this has got to be the largest fraud, backed up by intimidation and extortion and by the sheer force of taking peoples property and hard earned money without any lawful authorization whatsoever,” said lawyer Tom Cryer just days after a Louisiana acquitted him of two criminal tax counts.

Cryer went on to say: “These snake oil peddlers have conned millions of dollars out of many well-intended patriots and left a trail of broken lives in their wake. …These charlatans should be avoided, not only because they will lead you to bankruptcy and prison, but because by association they discredit those who are telling the truth.

Even though the legal citations in the case tend to run paragraphs long, Cryer says that the underlying issue is not really that complicated. In court, he argued that income is not necessarily any money that comes to a person, but rather categories such as profit and interest.

Cryer said the free exchange of labor for compensation has been upheld as a right by the Supreme Court, but that doesn’t necessarily make the compensation income.

If ever such an argument were to be presented on a nationwide basis, the income of the federal government would plummet. But their expenses could be reduced by an equal amount by eliminating programs, departments and agencies that also have no foundation in the Constitution.

Cryer rightly stated: “The Founding Fathers intentionally restricted the taxing powers of the new federal government as a measure of restraint on its size. By exceeding that limited taxing authority the federal government has been able to obtain resources beyond its intended reach, and that money has enabled the federal government to exceed its authority.”

For example, the Constitution does not empower the federal government to regulate education, employment, and agriculture, yet it continues to do so. This also goes for national health Care, but still there are those in Congress who are working day and night to take over the health insurance industry. I could give you many, many more examples.

The jury in U.S. District Court in Louisiana voted 12-0 to find Cryer, of Shreveport, not guilty of failure to file income taxes for two years. He had been indicted in 2006 on charges of failing to pay $73,000.00 to the IRS in 2000 and 2001.

Cryer is now working with Save-a-Patriot, the Free Enterprise Society, Live Free Now and his own Lie Free Zone to get the truth out there.

“There are three points that are important.” Cryer said. “There is no law making the average working person liable for income taxes. There is no law or regulation that allows the IRS to contend that earnings are 100 percent profit received in exchange for nothing, and the right to earn a living through any lawful occupation is a constitutionally protected fundamental right, and it is exempt from taxation.”

IRS spokesman, Robert Marvin, says the Internal Revenue Code provides for taxation on salaries or wages, but when pressed for a specific citation, or constitutional provision, says: “I can’t comment.

Cryer, along with me and others, warns, “Without a restoration of constitutional basics, our nation will be lost.”

“Please, people, read the Constitution and you will see that the federal role does not include ANY authority to regulate or tax any citizen directly and that WE expressly reserved the right to rule and govern ourselves as States, not as mere political subdivisions.”

“The Constitution does not allow the government to run your lives, but the money it is stealing from millions of American citizens is the fuel it needs to usurp one power after another.






“Abouna” Gregori

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

THURSDAY STUFF: AWAKE YOU WHO SLEEP -IV





“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”



This is a MUST read



AWAKE IV:


“The illegal we do immediately.

The unconstitutional takes a little longer.”

Henry Kissinger

Part I

TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE, THE BEST KEPT DARK SECRET IN AMERICA


What exactly is the Tavistock Institute?

The purpose of Tavistock is “Is to weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to under take the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as the ‘Aquarian Conspiracy’.


The Tavistock Institute was formed in 1947, as in independent not-for-profit organization to seek ways to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice (but it works hand in glove with both the United Nations and the European Union). Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors – government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. – nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, especially in health, education and community development.


Tavistock Institute is unique in that it has complete independence of being totally self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research orientation places it between, but NOT in, the worlds of academia and consultancy, and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.


All of the ideology of our American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. The eleventh Duke of Bedford, Marquis of Tavistock, in 1921 gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shell shock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish ‘the breaking point’ of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.



The Tavistock Institute headquarters are located in London, England. Sigmund Freud became the prophet of Tavistock when he moved to England, settling in Maresfield Gardens. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along with Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the United States through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Department personnel are trained, (are you beginning to get the picture of how far reaching their influence, in our lives, is?) U.S. Air force Intelligence and the Rand and Miter corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerine Society, Trilateral Commission (it is well to note that both the Trilateral Commission and the Commission on Foreign Relations are part and parcel of the United Nations. Also, both of theses commissions had their beginnings with none other than Col. Edward Mandel House. They were part of his grand scheme), Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome are the conduit for instructions to the Tavistock Institute network.


NOW FOR SOME HEADY STUFF: Tavistock Institute developed the brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedoms by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Levin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a “refugee”, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve the United States in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill, which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England (is it any wonder that much of the laws and law enforcement techniques, i.e., surveillance cameras all around London and other cities, eventually comes to America? Also, did you know that almost every single president of the United States is distantly related to the British Royal Family?), because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up the OSS, the forerunner of today’s CIA, under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.


It was the Tavistock Institute that originated the mass civilian bombing raids, carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill clearly as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping exact records of the results as they watched the “guinea pigs” reacting under “controlled” laboratory conditions. All Tavistock and American Foundation techniques have a single goal ---- to break down the psychological strength of the individuals and render them helpless to oppose the dictators of the One World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual morality is used by Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victims are then advised to “establish new rituals of personal interaction”, that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family.


Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one attains prominence in any field unless they have been trained (brainwashed) in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries. Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF (Kissinger is a very strong supporter of a One World Government). Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, hand picked Jimmy Carter for President of the United States, solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis (maybe this explains some of the totally asinine un-American statements that he has been making around the world over the last ten to twenty years, as well as his cozying up to the likes Fidel Castro, Yasser Arafat and other tyrants).



Tavistock has total control over the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government. The power of Tavistock is so great that our entire space program was sidelined for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatoly Rapport, and was promptly granted by the U.S. government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA.


One single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials, along with ordinary citizens, were given LSD, and their reactions studied like “guinea pigs”, resulted in several deaths. The U.S. government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. Here is how this ties together: The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London developed Lysergic Acid. Roosevelt’s adviser, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had, along with Prescott Bush, financed Adolph Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD “counter-culture” of the 1960’s., the so-called “student revolution”, which was financed to the tune of $25 million by the CIA.


Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs is tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post, on August 20, 1984, cites the “squalid consequences of the 60’s radicals in SDS” as resulting in “the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD and mental illness”. This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principle agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Ruskin, a protégé of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Ruskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy’s personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture.


A key agency as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.


One of the least known, but principle operations of the Rockefeller Foundation is its techniques for controlling the world’s agriculture. Kenneth Wernimont, the director of the Foundation, set up Rockefeller controlled agriculture programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The New World Order considers the independent farmers to be a great threat because they produce for themselves. And because their produce can be converted into capital, which gives them independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were shocked to find that their plans were under threat by the stubborn independence of the Kulaks (the small farmers). Josef Stalin’s answer to this problem was to order the OGPU to seize all food and animals belonging to the Kulaks, and to starve them out. On February 25, 1935, The Chicago American had a front page headline stating: SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants’ Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw attention away from this atrocity, it was later alleged that it was the Germans, not the Soviets, who had killed six million people.


So, here is the picture; it was the Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and the Workers, who exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest thorn in their side. The French Reign of terror was aimed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to revolutionary tribunals. In the United States, each of the Tavistock controlled foundations are engaged, at the present time, in the same type of war of extermination of American farmers. The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer’s need to for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Due to this need for cash, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the One World Order’s manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting the farmers. Just like the Kulaks of the Soviet Union, in the 1930’s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer is facing the exact same type of extermination. They are being forced to give up their small farm lands and become hired hands for the big agricultural trusts, such as ARCHER DANIAL MIDLAND and other large food corporations. The Brookings Institution, along with other Foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of what took place in the old Soviet Union, with one provision being that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he agrees to become a slave worker of the giant trusts.



Next Week, August 2nd, I will continue with Part II of the Tavistock Institute




Have a Great Day

“Abouna” Gregori