Wednesday, February 28, 2007

"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"

















If it’s Thursday, it Must be More Democrat Dumb Poop Day:




Florida May Ban Use of 'Illegal Alien'


Sen. Frederica Wilson, a Dumbocrat Florida state legislator who represents a district that is home to thousands of Caribbean immigrants, wants to put a stop to illegal aliens – no, not undocumented immigrants, but the use of the term "illegal alien” in official state documents. "I personally find the word ‘alien’ offensive when applied to individuals, especially to children. An alien to me is someone from out of [sic] space”, she said. She has introduced a bill that would bar a state agency or official from using the term.

Wilson said she doesn’t like the term "illegal,” either. "I like ‘undocumented’ better,” she said.

Hey Ms. Wilson, I got news for you! “Putting gravy on poop doesn’t make it Swedish Meatballs”, it’s still POOP!




Democrats Pushing for 'Gays in the Military'


Rep. Marty Meehan, a Massachusetts Dumbocrat, plans to re-introduce a bill repealing the congressional ban on homosexuals serving in the military. Meehan's Military Readiness Enhancement Act died last year in the Republican-controlled Congress. But with Democrats in charge, Meehan is more optimistic about passing the bill.

Meehan's bill would require the U.S. Armed Forces to adopt a policy of nondiscrimination based on sexual orientation - allowing homosexuals to openly serve in the military, something they cannot do now. Three turn-coat Republicans have signed on, including Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida.

Opposition to homosexuals serving in the military remains strong in conservative quarters.

Now that I think about it, perhaps it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to put gays and lesbians in the military, but only under the following conditions.

First; they MUST be in a platoon of their own, NOT integrated with the straight Troops. They can call it the Pansy Brigade.

Second; they should wear a distinctive uniform, perhaps a nice lavender.

Third; they should be the first ones sent to the front lines. That should get them out of our hair here back home.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

This Russian Pentecostal Leader is Right on the Mark:






"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"


This Russian Pentecostal Leader is Right on the Mark:





Russian Pentecostal leader refuses tolerance for gays:

Moscow, February 27, Interfax - Bishop Sergey Ryakhovsky, a Russian Protestant leader and a member of the Public Chamber of Russia, refused tolerance for gay parades’ participants.

“The tolerance our sexual minorities mention so often, does not in reality correspond to the concept of ‘right.’ The fundamental human rights as formulated by the UN General Assembly in 1948 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, do not include anything like a right to vice and or a right to moral crime,” Ryakhovsky said in his statement received by Interfax on Tuesday.

According to the bishop, the Russian Evangelical Christians (Pentecostals) are ready to hold up the traditional family values not only by personal examples or by sermons. ‘If they try again to plan a gay parade in Moscow or any other Russian city, we reaffirm our readiness to bring our protest out to the streets,’ he said.

He also regretted that heads of European capitals ‘miscall the aggressive propaganda of moral corruption “a spirit of respect of the universal human rights”.’

Mayors of
London, Paris and Berlin should remember the Bible that says God made a man and a woman, not ‘a universal creature,’ he added.

‘Dear Mayors, you were born only because your daddies were men and mammies women, and they behaved accordingly. The traditional family guarantees a healthy society and promises new generations to come, while homosexuality as an unproductive form of life destroys human ability to procreate children, given by our Maker, and endangers the very existents of the nation,’ the bishop noted.

Gee, wouldn’t be great if we could get the Anglicans, some Catholics and Protestants in this country to act accordingly?

Sadly, I have heard some bishops, who claim to be Orthodox, make the statement that gay couples live a non-violent life-style, so therefore it is ok and they are to be respected. Now, I don’t believe in going around thumbing the skulls of gays and lesbians. I do believe in respecting their human dignity, but that does not mean that I have to accept their life-style and no matter how non-violent they be, they are still sinning. No matter how much glitter you put on filth, it is still filth.

Monday, February 26, 2007

AN OBITUARY

"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"


A MOMENT TO PAUSE AND REMEMBER
AN OLD FRIEND:









Sunday, February 25, 2007

Just another attempt to destroy the Church of Jesus Christ.

"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"

The Following was found on the Drudge Report:

It is just another attempt to destroy the Church of

Jesus Christ.

Jesus Family Tomb Believed Found




Feb. 25, 2007 New scientific evidence, including DNA analysis conducted at one of the world's foremost molecular genetics laboratories, as well as studies by leading scholars, suggests a 2,000-year-old Jerusalem tomb could have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family.

The findings also suggest that Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have produced a son named Judah.

The DNA findings, alongside statistical conclusions made about the artifacts — originally excavated in 1980 — open a potentially significant chapter in Biblical archaeological history.

A documentary presenting the evidence, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," will premiere on the Discovery Channel on March 4 at 9 p.m. ET/PT. The documentary comes from executive producer James Cameron and director Simcha Jacobovici (Just in time to throw dirt on the Lenten and Paschal holiday)

The Talpiot Tomb

On March 28, 1980, a construction crew developing an apartment complex in Talpiot, Jerusalem, uncovered a tomb, which archaeologists from the Israeli Antiquities Authority excavated shortly thereafter. Archaeologist Shimon Gibson surveyed the site and drew a layout plan. Scholar L.Y. Rahmani later published "A Catalogue of Jewish Ossuaries" that described 10 ossuaries, or limestone bone boxes, found in the tomb.

Scholars know that from 30 B.C. to 70 A.D., many people in Jerusalem would first wrap bodies in shrouds after death. The bodies were then placed in carved rock tombs, where they decomposed for a year before the bones were placed in an ossuary.

Five of the 10 discovered boxes in the Talpiot tomb were inscribed with names believed to be associated with key figures in the New Testament: Jesus, Mary, Matthew, Joseph and Mary Magdalene. A sixth inscription, written in Aramaic, translates to "Judah Son of Jesus."

"Such tombs are very typical for that region," Aaron Brody, associate professor of Bible and archaeology at the Pacific School of Religion and director of California's Bade Museum told Discovery News.

Ossuary Inscriptions

At least four leading epigraphers have corroborated the ossuary inscriptions for the documentary, according to the Discovery Channel.

Frank Moore Cross, a professor emeritus in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Harvard University, told Discovery News, "The inscriptions are from the Herodian Period (which occurred from around 1 B.C. to 1 A.D.). The use of limestone ossuaries and the varied script styles are characteristic of that time."

Jodi Magness, associate department chair of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told Discovery News that, based on the New Testament writings, "Jesus likely lived during the first century A.D."

In addition to the "Judah son of Jesus" inscription, which is written in Aramaic on one of the ossuaries, another limestone burial box is labeled in Aramaic with "Jesus Son of Joseph." Another bears the Hebrew inscription "Maria," a Latin version of "Miriam," or, in English, "Mary." Yet another ossuary inscription, written in Hebrew, reads "Matia," the original Hebrew word for "Matthew." Only one of the inscriptions is written in Greek. It reads, "Mariamene e Mara," which can be translated as, "Mary known as the master."

Francois Bovon, professor of the history of religion at Harvard University, told Discovery News, "Mariamene, or Mariamne, probably was the actual name given to Mary Magdalene."

Bovon explained that he and a colleague discovered a fourteenth century copy in Greek of a fourth century text that contains the most complete version of the "Acts of Philip" ever found. Although not included in the Bible, the "Acts of Philip" mentions the apostles and Mariamne, sister of the apostle Philip.

"When Philip is weak, she is strong," Bovon said. "She likely was a great teacher who even inspired her own sect of followers, called Mariamnists, who existed from around the 2nd to the 3rd century."

(Just some more Gnostic and New Age Crap)

DNA Analysis

Jacobovici, director, producer and writer of "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," and his team obtained two sets of samples from the ossuaries for DNA and chemical analysis. The first set consisted of bits of matter taken from the "Jesus Son of Joseph" and "Mariamene e Mara" ossuaries. The second set consisted of patina — a chemical film encrustation on one of the limestone boxes.

The human remains were analyzed by Carney Matheson, a scientist at the Paleo-DNA Laboratory at Lakehead University in Ontario, Canada. Mitochondrial DNA examination determined the individual in the Jesus ossuary and the person in the ossuary linked to Mary Magdalene were not related.

Since tombs normally contain either blood relations or spouses, Jacobovici and his team suggest it is possible Jesus and Mary Magdalene were a couple. "Judah," whom they indicate may have been their son, could have been the "lad" described in the Gospel of John as sleeping in Jesus' lap at the Last Supper. (I have read and re-read the Gospel of John and I have never seen where it said anything about a “lad” sleeping in Jesus’ lap at the last supper. This is plain unadulterated B. S.)

Discovery has set up a special Web site, www.discovery.com/tomb, to provide related in-depth information and to allow viewers to come to their own conclusions about the entire matter.

As Academy Award-winner Cameron said in a press release, "It doesn't get bigger than this. We've done our homework; we've made the case; and now it's time for the debate to begin."

And we can all wait with bated breath to see what the next attack will be and from where.

TWO TROUBLING STORIES:

"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"






Here is the reason why
we need to vote for
Tom
Tancredo for President in
2008:

PARRISH, Fla.Florida police on Sunday
issued a warrant for a man suspected of kidnapping a 13-year-old
boy at gunpoint in an apparent ransom attempt, police said.

From Fox News

The man, whom authorities identified as Vicente Ignacio Beltran Marina,
is believed to be Mexican (most likely an illegal immigrant). He is wanted
in connection with the Friday morning kidnapping of Clay Moore from a
school bus stop in
Parrish, Fla. Moore was able to escape several hours
later.

"This was an absolute kidnapping for ransom," Manatee County Sheriff
Charlie Wells said at a press conference Sunday morning.

"We have been able to positively conclude that this was an out-and-out
kidnapping and that the person wanted money in exchange for Clay
Moore."

Authorities said Marina is a former migrant worker at the farm where
Moore
was ultimately found. Police believe Marina, most recently employed
with an aluminum contractor, has fled
Florida.

"I think we do have a sporting chance to bring him back to Manatee County
and have him stand trial for this crime," Wells said.

Early Friday morning, Clay was ordered to get into a red Ford Ranger,
bound and taken to a wooded rural area about 20 miles away. Clay freed himself after he was left alone and then walked until he found a farm
worker with a cell phone.

The man suspected of being the kidnapper is believed to be an illegal
immigrant from Mexico. We have enough crimminal elements of our
own in this country, so why should we have to allow those from other countries to sneak in and put our citizens in danger? Enough is enough!

President Bush, the Republican Congress and now the Democrat Congress
refuse to secure our borders, and you can bet that none of those running for president in 2008 on the Democratic ticket, nor any of the front runners on the Republican ticket will do anything either.

I say we should and must push for Tom Tancredo for President. He is the ONLY one who has the courage to secure the borders and NOT grant amnesty to the illegals already here.






BOY ARE WE HITTING A
NEW LOW!

From Fox News:

PORTLAND, Ore. — An 84-year-old woman who confessed to having sex with an 11-year-old boy in
her foster care reached a deal with prosecutors and pleaded guilty Thursday to attempted sex abuse, officials said.

Georgie Audean Buoy will serve 36 months in prison, said Leslie Wolf, chief deputy district attorney for Wasco County. She was originally charged with six counts, including attempted rape, for which she faced eight years in prison, Wolf said.

In a taped confession, Buoy admitted to having sex with the boy while he was in her care in 2004, Wolf said. Her age and lack of prior criminal convictions played a role in the plea deal.

Buoy's attorney, Andrew Carter, did not return messages Thursday.

She must register as a sex offender after serving her sentence at a women's prison, and must pay $5,000 to the victim, as well as up to $7,500 in restitution for counseling.

If you can't trust "Granny", who can you trust?







Friday, February 23, 2007





Welcome Back To My Saturday Corner

My Quote of the Week:

"There is no psychiatrist in the world like me licking your face."

The following is my new Saturday feature. Hope you enjoy it.























If any of you has a question for me, Auntie Munchkin, please email them to my
Daddy at:

abouna@apostle1.com

I will answer it here at Munchkin’s Saturday Corner.


Y’all come back again. Have a real good week and Lord willin’

and the creek don’t rise, I’ll see you next Saturday.


Thursday, February 22, 2007

"JUST HITTING ANOTER
BRICK WALL"














That means it is time to open my


Files:






Quote of the Week:

"Everybody in politics lies, but they [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling,” David Geffen


This is very disturbing!

Ash Wednesday Mass Interrupted by Porno Recordings:

SANTA FE — The Roman Catholic Cathedral Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi was evacuated during noon Mass on Ash Wednesday when three CD players duct-taped to the bottom of pews began blaring sexually explicit language.



The players were set to turn on at 12:22 p.m. as parishioners were in the middle of Mass, police Capt. Gary Johnson said.


The recordings were filled with people using foul language and "pornographic messages," Johnson said. He would not elaborate because of the ongoing investigation.


Church staff personnel removed the CD players, took them to the basement and called police, who sent a bomb squad, Johnson said.


The bomb squad blew up two of the players on a grassy area near the church, then kept the third one for analysis after determining the players were not dangerous.


The recordings were made on store-bought blank discs, Johnson said.


"We'll run the full gamut" of tests on the player, including checking for fingerprints or DNA and tracing its components, he said.


Ash Wednesday is the first day of Lent, which marks a 40-day period of fasting before Easter. Clergy mark the foreheads of the faithful with ashes to symbolize penance during Ash Wednesday services.






This cartoon shows how the Democrats give a "Pat on the Back".

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Is President Bush the Monkey in the Middle?

"JUST HITTING
ANOTHER BRICK WALL"



"ABOUNA" SAYS:

Is President Bush the Monkey in the Middle?








House Democrats are pretending that their nonbinding resolution against the Iraq troop surge was of great import, anti-war champion Rep. John Murtha spoke the truth. It is not "the real vote," he said. That comes with Murtha's imminent attempt to hamstring President Bush's conduct of the war that may well spark a constitutional crisis.


Murtha wants to attach conditions on the impending supplemental appropriations bill to fund the war. He would require that troops have a year at home before redeploying, that they train with their own equipment before deploying and so on. Because the too-small U.S. military is under enormous strain, these conditions would be impossible to meet while still doubling the number of U.S. combat troops in Baghdad.


Murtha repeatedly says that his proposals are meant to "protect" the troops. But he is frank about the not-so-ulterior motive of keeping more troops from heading to Iraq, explaining that "they won't be able to do the work." Because his provisions can be sold as guaranteeing the readiness and quality-of-life of the troops, Murtha believes that they "will be very hard to find fault with."

The president, not Congress, is the commander in chief. Congress was never meant to, nor is it suited to, direct tactical military decisions, as Murtha seeks to do with his restrictions.


His maneuver will be the most blatant congressional intrusion on the president's war-making powers in the nation's history. Congress choked off the Vietnam War in the 1970s, but only after U.S. ground troops were mostly already out of the country and chiefly as a matter of cutting off aid to South Vietnam.


Murtha relies on failure in Iraq as a political strategy. The plan is a "slow-bleed" anti-war strategy. The surge is the best chance of turning the war around. By hampering it, Democrats will ensure that the war continues to fail, and thus that domestic political support for it plummets to the point where Democrats feel safe in de-funding it. It used to be that the war had to end because it was a failure; now it must fail so that it can end.


Democrats simply believe the war is irretrievably lost. But they still pay laughably unserious lip service to the notion of success. Murtha says there's no military solution in Iraq, that we can win in Iraq only through the political process — as if it has no effect on the political process whether Shia militias are murdering Sunnis unchecked or hiding out to avoid the surge. Murtha maintains that if we leave, "al-Qaeda’s going to disappear." What, when pigs fly?


President Bush will have no choice but to reject the Murtha restrictions should they reach his desk. But a veto is problematic. As Murtha points out, a veto means that Bush doesn't get the continued funding for the war. He might have to sign the bill, take the funding and ignore the restrictions as an unconstitutional trespass on his powers. In that event, a cry to impeach him will go up from the increasingly powerful anti-war left.


As a result of the Democrats' dirty little game could be a constitutional crisis from which no one — least of all the country — will emerge a winner.



CHARLIE DANIELS SAYS:

"JUST HITTING ANOTHER
BRICK WALL"


"ABOUNA" SAYS:

The following is a message from
Charlie Daniels:





I don’t know how everybody else feels about it, but to me I think Hispanic people in this country, legally or illegally, made a huge public relations mistake with their recent demonstrations.

I don’t blame anybody in the world for wanting to come to the United States of America, as it is a truly wonderful place.

But when the first thing you do when you set foot on American soil is an illegal act, that is flat out wrong and I don’t care how many lala land left heads come out of the woodwork and start trying to give me sensitivity lessons.

I don’t need sensitivity lessons; in fact, I don’t have anything against Mexicans! I just have something against criminals and anybody who comes into this country illegally is a criminal and if you don’t believe it, try coming into America from any place else in the world without a passport and see how far you get. What disturbs me about the demonstrations is that it’s tantamount to saying; I am going to come into your country even if it means breaking your laws and there is nothing you can do about it.”

It is an ‘in your face’ action and speaking just for me, I don’t like it one little bit and if there were a half dozen pair of gonads in Washington bigger than English peas it wouldn’t be happening.

Where are you, you bunch of lily livered, pantywaist, forked tongued, sorry excuses for defenders of the Constitution? Have you been drinking the water out of the Potomac again? And even if you pass a bill on immigration it will probably be so pork laden and watered down that it won’t mean any thing anyway. Besides, what good is another law going to do when you won’t enforce the ones on the books now?

And what ever happened to the polls, guys? I thought you folks were the quintessential finger wetters. Well you sure ain’t paying any attention to the polls this time because somewhere around eighty percent of Americans want something done about this mess, and mess it is and getting bigger every day.

This is no longer a problem; it is dilemma and headed for being a tragedy. Do you honestly think that what happened in France with the Muslims can’t happen here when the businesses who hire these people finally run out of jobs and a few million disillusioned Hispanics take to the streets?

If you Mr. President, Congressmen and Senators, knuckle under on this and refuse to do something meaningful it means that you care nothing for the kind of country your children and grand-children will inherit. But I guess that doesn’t matter as long as you get re-elected. Shame on you.

One of the big problems in America today is that if you have the nerve to say anything derogatory about any group of people (except Christians) you are going to be screamed at by the media and called a racist, a bigot and anything else they can think of to call you.

Well, I been pounded by the media before and I’m still rockin’ and rollin’ and when it comes to speaking the truth I fear not. And the truth is that the gutless, gonad less, milksop politicians are just about to sell out the United States of America because they don’t have the intestinal fortitude to stand up and face reality.

And reality is that we would never allow any other group of people to have 12 million illegals in this country and turn around and say, “Oh, its ok, ya’ll can stay here if you just allow us to slap your wrist.”

And I know that some of you who read this are saying; “Well, what’s wrong with that?” I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it. These people could be from Mars as far as we know. We don’t know who they are, where they are, what they might be bringing in, or what they are up to and the way Congress is going we’re not going to know.

Does this make sense? Labor force you say? We already subsidize corporate agriculture as it is, must we subsidize their labor as well? If these people were from Haiti would we be so fast to turn a blind eye to them, or if they were from Somalia or Afghanistan? I think not.

All the media shows us are pictures of hardworking Hispanics who have crossed the border just to try to better their life (but if they are here without proper documentation, they are law breakers), but they don’t show you pictures of the Feds rounding up members of MS13, the violent gang who came across the same way the “decent folks” did. They don’t tell you about the living conditions of the Mexican illegals some fat cat hired to pick his crops for little or nothing.

I want to make two predictions:

No.1: This situation is going to grow and fester until it erupts in violence on our streets while the wimps in Washington drag their toes in the dirt and try to figure out how many tons of political hay they can make to the acre.

No.2: Somebody is going to cross that border (if they haven’t already) with some kind of weapon of mass destruction and set it off in a major American city after which there will be a backlash such as this country has never experienced and the Capitol Building in Washington will probably tilt as Congressmen and Senators rush to the other side of the issue.

I don’t know about you, but I would love to see just one major politician stand up and say, “I don’t care who I make mad and I don’t care how many votes I lose, this is desperate situation and I am going to lead the fight to get it straightened out.”

I don’t blame anybody for coming to America, but if you don’t respect our immigration laws why should you respect any of our other laws?

And by the way, this is America and our flag has stars and stripes, so please get that other one out of my face.

God Bless America,

Charlie Daniels