WEDNESDAY: GOLDEN PIG AWARD - #6

“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”

Today’s Golden Pig award is going to Ms. Lindsay Lohan and her mother:

Fresh out of rehab, the media darling has once again been arrested and booked on suspicion of drunken driving and possession of cocaine, early Tuesday morning.

Less than two weeks out of rehab and a previous drunken-driving case still pending, Lohan’s blood alcohol level was between 0.12 and 0.13 percent when police found her at 1:30 am. The legal limit in the State of California is 0.08. She was booked for investigation of driving under the influence and driving on a suspended license, both of which are misdemeanors, and for possession of cocaine and transport of a narcotic, which are felonies. She was released several hours later on $25,000.00 bail.

It appears that the poor little rich girl just can’t stop hitting the sauce and the drugs.

Lindsay’s mother Dina rightfully deserves to share in the honor of the Golden Pig Award, because if she had spent as much time being a mother to Lindsay and less time being her daughter’s best friend, perhaps Lindsay’s life would have been less chaotic. Lindsay has been surrounded by enablers, and her mother has been one of the biggest. My guess is that mother Lohan is afraid she will lose her goose that laid the golden egg, if she tries to bring her daughter under control.

Now for page two:

Why Parents Drink

A Father passing by his son's bedroom was astonished to see that his bed was nicely made and everything was picked up.

Then he saw an envelope, propped up prominently on the pillow that was addressed to "Dad." With the worst premonition he opened the envelope with trembling hands and read the letter.

Dear Dad:
It is with great regret and sorrow that I'm writing you. I had to elope with my new girlfriend because I wanted to avoid a scene with mom and you. I have been finding real passion with Stacy and she is so nice. But I knew you would not approve of her because of all her piercings, tattoos, tight motorcycle clothes and the fact that she is much older than I am.

But it's not only the passion...Dad...she's pregnant.

Stacy said that we will be very happy. She owns a trailer in the woods and has a stack of firewood for the whole winter.

We share a dream of having many more children. Stacy has opened my eyes to the fact that marijuana doesn't really hurt anyone.

We'll be growing it for ourselves and trading it with the other people that live nearby for cocaine and ecstasy.

In the meantime, we will pray that science will find a cure for AIDS so Stacy can get better. She deserves it.

Don't worry Dad. I'm 15 and I know how to take care of myself.

Someday I'm sure that we will be back to visit so that you can get to know your Grandchildren.

Love, Your Son John

PS.

Dad, none of the above is true. I'm over at Tommy's house.

I just wanted to remind you that there are worse things in life than a bad report card (it's in my center desk drawer).

I love you.

Call me when it's safe to come home.

“Abouna” Gregori

TUESDAY LESSONS IN CIVICS-#10

LESSONS IN CIVICS & THE CONSTITUTION – I

Part B

Introduction of the George Rapp Society

First Successful Communistic, Religious, Organization in the

United States

Defendants, to sustain the issue on their part, produced the articles of association into evidence. Some of the salient parts are shown below:

ARTICLE 1: We the undersigned, for ourselves and our heirs’ executors and administrators, do herby give, grant and forever convey, to the said George Rapp and his associates, and their heirs, and assigns, all our property…for the benefit of said association or community.

ARTICLE 2: We do further covenant and agree to with the said George Rapp and his associates that we will severally submit faithfully to the laws and regulations of said community,…therefore holding ourselves bound to promote the interest and welfare of the said community, not only by the labor of our own hands, but also by that of our children, our families and all others who now or hereafter may be under our control.

ARTICLE 3: …that we will never claim or demand either for ourselves, our children, or for anyone belonging to us, directly or indirectly, any compensation, wages or rewards whatever, for our, or their labor or services, rendered to the said community, …

ARTICLE 5: The said George Rapp and his associates further agree to supply the undersigned severally with all the necessaries of life…and to such extent as their circumstances may require.

ARTICLE 6: If any of the undersigned…should withdraw from the association, then the said George Rapp and his associates agree to refund to him or them the value of all such property without interest, as he or they may have brought into the community…Said value to be refunded…as the said George Rapp and his associates shall determine.

The court ruled for defendant George Rapp on the basis that “an association for the purpose expressed is prohibited neither by statute nor the common law.” And the court further stated: “It is supposed, however, that as the in testate had power, by the articles, to secede from the society and take out whatever he brought into it, the successor to his personal rights may exercise it as his representative. Such, however, are not the terms of the articles…The right of accession, therefore, is not intransmissable.” The court also stated that “The law knows no duress by advice and persuasion”, thus, there was no fraud in the inducement to sign the article.

When one studies this case they can see that the complaint was brought under the jurisdiction of common law and that the plaintiff lost the case because of the common law and constitutionally protected right to contract. Under the common law, the only way to break the contract would be to prove fraud. According to court testimony, the members of the association intended to make money when they entered it. None of the witnesses explained how they expected to make money under the terms of the contract, so the only reasonable explanation is that they were gambling that they would be last survivors in the Association and share in the distribution of assets; and/or they expected to benefit from limited liability by sharing any loses of the association with the other members. Last survivors take all is a wagering policy, and mutual sharing of losses is insurance.

When investigating the George Rapp Association formula, we find the contract contained a forfeiture clause. Members would “never claim compensation;” upon withdrawal, the value of their property would be refunded “without interest”, and the right of accession of property donated to the Association is intransmissable to heirs of the decedent.

Rapp and his associates, as the insurers, had no risk. Not only had they nothing to lose in the event of the death of a contributor and member, but they gained all of the property donated with no possible claim from heirs of the decedent. Thus it was a controlled economy under the exclusive control of George Rapp and his associates, as there was no accountability to the members of the Association. I will show, later, that if Mr. Schriber had presented these facts to an Admiralty court and applied the proper Admiralty law to these facts, he would have won the case.

Rapp had it made. Why shouldn’t he be successful? After all, by contract he had slave labor, donations of untold wealth from members, who if they chose to leave the association before they died, could only get back what they donated without benefit of interest, and if they died while still a member of the association, the property and assets which they donated remained the property of the association as long as it existed.

Rapp died in 1847, but the society continued on. The tremendous wealth amassed by this society was eventually used to fashion and promote George Rapp Society on a much grander scale with plans to ultimately encompass the entire world in a “SUPERSTATE” controlled and governed entirely by mercantile interests, all under the protection under the law of admiralty. This would be a super state where all the property in the world and all the people on earth would be pledged to the benefit of this World Wide Mercantile association, THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

Next week, July 31st, I will cover the DeLovio vs. Boit case – {1815}

Now, Just for Laughs, Click on the

Mexican Flag to Get a Humorous

Look at Reverse Immigration

“Abouna” Gregori

MONDAY MADNESS #5

“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”

The Constitution of the United States is in Mortal Danger!

“Political corruption begins with every voter who votes

with their pocketbook instead of for what’s good for the

country. There is little difference between the selling of

their vote by an elected official and the selling of their

vote by a voter, to whatever candidate promises them

some benefit.”

Jon Roland during campaign speech for run for congress, 1974

Last night, on the Fox News channel, it was reported that with the help of Sen. Hillary Clinton and others, the Democrats in the Senate are “secretly” working toward a complete government take over of the health care industry, a huge step toward socialism. This is being done by passing legislation to get more of America’s children covered by a national health care program, and to eventually lower the age to make more people eligible to receive Medicare benefits. This will greatly expand the governments control over our private lives as they grab ever more control over Health Care, until they are in complete control. So what is the problem?

The problem goes back to what I have been trying to enlighten people about for long time. Violation of the Constitution of the United States, the very Constitution that those we elect to office, take a sworn oath to uphold and defend. So how does health care violate the Constitution? Because it is a usurpation of power that does not belong to the federal government, plain and simple.

What exactly is usurpation? Usurpations is the assuming or exercise of powers by a branch or agent of government which have NOT been delegated to them by WE THE PEOPLE through the Constitution, which is the “Supreme Law of the Land”. Under a constitutional republic which is exactly what the government of the United States IS, all acts by elected officials can only be legitimate if they are consistent with, and in agreement with the constitution, a body of laws which are superior to all subsequent statutes, rules and regulations and other acts of officials which embodies all delegations of power. It is a basic and fundamental principle that all acts of officials NOT derived from the delegated powers of the constitution are null and void from their very inception, not just from the point at which a court may find them unconstitutional. Each and every person who has any kind of encounter with the acts of officials has the duty and obligation to not only obey legitimate official acts, but to also help enforce them, but, when there is a conflict between the acts of officials and the superior act (Constitution) means that we are to obey and enforce the Constitution and not the act which is in conflict with it. Judges and other citizens do not “decide” constitutionality; rather we discover it, and every person who is involved with any act by an official has a non-delegable duty to make a determination of the constitutionality of that act. This determination is called constitutional review and, when exercised by a judge in a case, it is called judicial review.

If one truly cares about their country and their freedoms, I strongly advise you to get your hands on a pocket sized copy of the Constitution of the United States, and read it frequently. These are cheap enough at most book stores and there are not that many pages. The constitution enumerates all of the powers that have been delegated to each of the three branches of the Government. The powers (or areas of their jurisdiction) which are listed in the constitution are the only powers they have, no more and no less, and they do not have any right or power to cede any of their delegated powers to any other branch of the government or to any other individual, organization or group. Any powers not specifically delegated to one of three branches of government, belong to the individual States.

Now, if you read the constitution, you will discover that nowhere in the constitution has any branch of government been given the constitutional power or authority to be involved with the financing of the health care of the citizens, nor do they have the right or power to be involved in education. The same holds true when it comes to the punishment of crimes. Congress was only delegated the power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, and piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, but no other crimes whatsoever.

When you apply this standard to the vast majority of laws, rules and regulations which have been enacted and passed over the last 60 years, or to the numerous federal agencies and regulations established during the same period of time, is it any wonder that those of us who believe in the constitution see a conspiracy to incrementally over throw and do away with the constitution? You must understand that none of the rights and freedoms guaranteed to us under the Bill of Rights can protect us if the restrictions placed upon government power are not strictly enforced and if our elected officials are free to violate their oath of office as well as the constitution.

Since the ratification of the Constitution of the United States and each of its properly ratified amendments, there have been numerous acts by our elected officials, including statutes, regulations, executive orders, court rulings, and ordinary decisions and actions taken while on duty and under the color of law, which have been and are unconstitutional and in many cases, in violation of the civil rights of persons and of constitutional laws.

Usurpations aren’t the only danger to our freedoms and to our republic. There is a larger class of abuses which include corruption and violations of constitutional statutes. It should be of special concern to us when our elected officials conspire among themselves to pass legislation that is in direct violation of the constitution, as in the case of the national health care laws, or to refuse to enforce constitutional laws, as in the case of our immigration laws, and worse yet, when they conspire not to enforce the law against such corruptions, and use the resources of the government and the powers of their offices to cover up such crimes or otherwise protect the perpetrators, whether those crimes are committed by the officials themselves or by powerful persons who are allowed to become a privileged class that is above the law. We the People MUST step in and take action to enforce the laws, when our elected officials fail to uphold their oath of office and the constitution. It is also incumbent upon us to immediately remove those officials from office and replace them with others who WILL do their constitutional duty and live up to their oath of office.

For far too long, the citizens of the United States have failed to do their duty to independently determine the constitutionality and legality of the official acts that have been passed by congress, the president, and even many of the decisions of the Supreme Court. The citizens of this country all to willing to turn a blind eye to these abuses by delegating their duty to courts, superiors, or legal advisors. The Constitution of the United States was meant to be understood and enforced by every citizen, according to the original intent of the Framers. One needs only to witness what happens in other countries, such as the old Soviet Union, when an otherwise perfectly good constitution is not enforced by every citizen in the land. This is especially important when the courts become corrupt, and interpret the Constitution in ways that serve, not the citizens, but those who control the purse and the power.

Today, the Constitution that has protected our rights and liberties for over 200 years, is in greater danger of being overthrown and/or abolished than at any time in our history. Generations of patriotic and brave citizens have fought and died to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, but today, under the guise of “Homeland Security” and the “War on Terror”, if we fail to take action, and soon, to defend it against its enemies today, “One World Government” proponents, the “Open Border” advocates, and the Liberal Democrats who believe in appeasing the Islamists, then all those lives will have been sacrificed in vain.

The real enemies that are a threat to our freedoms and way of life are not just terrorists, the hordes of illegal immigrants, nuclear proliferation, global warming, even though these things may pose a serious threat, but the most deadly enemy are those whom we elect to represent us, along with those who control the purse strings, who are grasping for power within the very governmental institutions that our forefathers have founded to keep us free.

Many of you do not believe that United States can be overthrown by a coup. Many of you believe that there is no one who would try such a thing, and even if they did, they would not succeed. But suppose it was happening but almost nobody was aware of it or recognized it for what it was? Could the Constitution be overthrown in bits and pieces, over decades and in secret, allowing the external trappings of constitutional governance to continue while the real power was being exercised behind the scenes by people who are no longer accountable to the people?

Tune in again next Monday for the conclusion of this article.

“Abouna” Gregori

SUNDAYS TWO-CENTS WORTH- #5

“Just Hitting Another Brick Wall”

Since I have been in a rather silly mood all day, I have decided to use today’s Blog to share a couple of Blond jokes with you:

Note: These are just for laughs and not intended to be an insult to any of my Blond visitors.

A Couple of blond Jokes:

Bob, a handsome dude, walked into a sports bar at 9:58 PM. He sat down next to a blond at the bar and stared up at the TV.

The 10:00 PM news was coming on. The news crew was covering a story of a man on a ledge of a large building preparing to jump

The blond looked at Bob and said, "Do you think he'll jump?"

Bob says, "You know, I bet he'll jump."

The blond replied, "Well, I bet he won't."

Bob placed a $20 bill on the bar and said, "You're on!"

Just as the blond placed her money on the bar, the guy on the ledge
did a swan dive off the building, falling to his death.

The blond was very upset, but willingly handed her $20 to Bob, saying;
"Fair's fair. Here's your money."

Bob replied, "I can't take your money, I saw this earlier on the 5 PM
news and so I knew he would jump."

The blond replied, "I did too, but I didn't think he'd do it again."

Bob took the money......

The Blond & The Heart Attack

A blond gets home early from shopping and hears
strange noises coming from the bedroom.

She rushes upstairs to find her husband naked on the bed,
sweating and panting.

"What's up?" she asks.
"I'm having a heart attack," cries the husband.

The blond rushes downstairs to grab the phone, but
just as she's dialing, her four-year-old son comes up and says;

"Mommy! Mommy! Aunt Shirley is hiding in your closet, and she's got
no clothes on!"

The blond slams the phone down and storms upstairs
into the bedroom, right past her husband, and rips open the closet
door. Sure enough, there is her sister, totally naked and cowering
on the closet floor.

"You stupid nut case”, she screams.

"My husband's having a heart attack, and
you're running around naked scaring the kids!!"

“Abouna” Gregori

MUNCHKIN'S SATURDAY CORNER # 18

This is a “NO POOP” Zone:

Today’s Post is on the serious side.

Our Brave New World:

A Canadian Pastor Facing Trial Due to Hate Crimes Laws:

A Canadian pastor is facing a hearing before the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission over a letter he wrote to a newspaper in which he condemned homosexuality. He is being accused of influencing the beating of a 17 year old gay male, which took place days after the letter appeared in the paper.

The letter was written five years ago in an Alberta Canada newspaper By Rev. Stephen Boissoin. Two weeks later a 17 year old homosexual was beaten. A complaint was filed against Rev. Boissoin, and the commission is hearing the case this week.

The founder of the Orlando based Liberty Counsel, Mat Staver, said: “What we see happening in Canada is a person’s free speech—speech on the matter of homosexuality, which says that says homosexuality is wrong and which speaks of the homosexual agenda—is now being punished in court and the person is being put on trial solely for what the individual spoke.”

Staver also warns that the case is an example of what could happen in the United States if hate crimes legislation is passed.

“We must protect our free exercise of religion and our freedom of expression. We must be able to speak out in America and around the world about sexuality – and specifically that homosexuality is wrong, immoral, unnatural and harmful.”

Liberal Democrats Lift Tipster Shields:

Congressional Liberal Democrats refused to protect those who report suspicious behavior from nuisance lawsuits.

“This is a slap in the face of decent and good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward, and it caves in to radical Islamists,” said Rep. Peter King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.

Well, what can you expect from the very people who refuse to secure your borders? They won’t and don’t want to protect us from foreign invasion, and they don’t want to protect you from reprisals when you report suspicious behavior. So just whose side are your elected officials on? Can You Say “TRAITOR”?

Have a great week. I’ll see ya all next Saturday, Lord willing and the creek don’t rise.

FREAKY DEAKY FRIDAY: _ E

Female Teachers Who Love to

Diddle their Underage Male Students:

Okay folks, here is a real Freaky Deaky Friday “Freak’s List”.

Adrianne Hockett: Accused of having sex with a 16-yearold ‘special needs” student. She even rented an apartment in Houston, Texas especially for these get togethers. The boy testified that “We would have sex, drink beer and smoke weed.”

Allenna Ward, 24: A minister’s daughter from Lauren County, S.C., who was a second-year teacher at Bell Street Middle School in Clinton, S.C., when she was fired on Feb. 28, 2007, for allegedly having sex with at least five boys. Some of the purported victims, ages 14 and 15, were students at Ward’s school. Authorities say that the married Ward had sex with the boys not only on the school campus, but also at a motel, in a park and behind a restaurant.

Amber Jennings, 31: Although this Sturbridge, Mass., woman was originally charged with having sex with a 16-yearold, the counts were reduced down to disseminating harmful materials to a minor. She admitted emailing naked pictures of herself to a former student. She was given no jail time. She was only given two-years of probation after pleading guilty in September 2005.

Amber Marshall, 23: This Northwestern Indiana woman allegedly had sexual contact, including intercourse, with several students at Hebron High School, and turned herself into authorities, telling the police that she knew what she did was illegal.

Amira Sa’Di, 30: A Clayton County, GA., math teacher a Mundy’s Mill High School was arrested and charged with sexual assault of a student in November 2005. The Student was a 15 year-old boy.

Amy Bramhall, 33: An Education Technician was arrested in January 2006 after a 15 year-old boy at the alternative education school in Warren, Maine, told police that he had an on-going sexual relationship with her. He claims to have had over 200 sexual encounters with the woman. In December 2006, she received three and a half years in prison, with all but one year suspended, and four years probation.

Amy Gail Lilley, 36: Inverness, Fla., woman and softball coach at Lecanto High School charged with a lesbian relationship with a 15-year-old girl. She received no prison time, being sentenced in January 2006 to two years of house arrest and eight more years of probation.

Believe it or not, but there are 97 more of these women teachers on the list, and if any of you are overly interested in knowing who they are, I may list more next week.

But the real thing to notice here, is the great disparity between their sentences and those that male offenders receive. Where is the fairness? Where is the equality?

But the most important question: HOW COME NONE OF MY TEACHERS EVER MOLESTED ME? Damn, I feel cheated!

Kirby Grant – Sky King; Gloria Winters – Penny;

Songbird – Cessna 310B; Flying Crown Ranch - Home

“Abouna” Gregori